Ethnography in Romania: Hegemony, Project and the Myth of Structuralism

Authors

  • Alexandru Iorga University of Bucharest and Constantin Brăiloiu Autor

Keywords:

[history of] ethnography, anthropology, sociology, institutionalization, Romanian Ethnographic Atlas, Romanian Academy

Abstract

This article is the second in a series of texts about ethnography in Romania. In the previous paper[1], I discussed the tangled history of ethnography and other social sciences, pointing out that the hegemonic project of interwar sociology in Romania had a significant impact on the development of ethnography as a scientific discipline[2]. I highlighted the fact that ethnography – understood in its broader political context was (i.) guided by the shadows of the past, (ii.) and its main role was to discipline and patrimonialize popular culture, and (iii.) it was neither synchronous nor ground-breaking in relation to other comparable cases in Europe. In what follows, I focus on the institutionalized ethnographic research agenda and on the various meanings of such research by discussing its relationships with other social sciences in the context of the national development of ethnography as a distinct branch (e.g. from anthropology) since its very beginning. Secondly, I argue that institutionalized ethnographic practice in Romania during the communist period and immediately after the fall of the communist regime significantly lacked reflective assessments and development of a theoretical corpus. I focus on the research practices developed in the context of the decadeslong project of the Romanian Ethnographic Atlas (REA), and its impact on the current status of the discipline.

References

Baskar, Bojan. 2008. “Small National Ethnologies and Supranational Empires: The Case of the Habsburg Monarchy.” In Everyday Culture in Europe: Approaches and Methodologies, edited by Mairead Nic Craith, Ulrich Kockel, and Reinhard Johler. Farnham: Ashgate: 65–80.

Buhociu, Octavian. 1966. “Folklore and Ethnography in Rumania.” Current Anthropology 7 (3): 295-314.

Čapo, Jasna. 2014. “Ethnology and Anthropology in Europe. Towards a Trans-National Discipline.” Cultural Analysis 13: 51–76.

Case, Holly. 2009. Between States: the Transylvanian Question and the European Idea during World War II. California: Stanford University Press.

Chelcea, Liviu. 2009. “A face familiarul exotic şi exoticul familiar: o hartă a cercetării antropologice din România.” Sociologie Românească 7 (3): 13–19.

Comișel, Emilia. 1960. “Le folklore musical Roumain depuis 1945.” Acta Musicologica 32 (2/3): 90–93.

Cole, John W. 1984. “Notes on Anthropology in Romania.” Research Report 24: Econo my, Society and Culture in Contemporary Romania. Paper 22. Retrieved Oct 2014 from:http://scholarworks.umass.edu/anthro_res_rpt24/22

Cotoi, Călin. 2011. “Sociology and Ethnography in Romania: The Avatars of Social Sciences in Socialist Romania.” In Sociology and Ethnography East-Central and South-East Europe: Scientific Self-description in State Socialist Countries, edited by Ulf Brunbauer, Claudia Kraft, and Martin Schultze Wessel. München: Oldenbourg Verlag.

Frykman, Jonas. 2012. “A Tale of Two Disciplines: European Ethnology and the Anthropology of Europe.” In A Companion to the Anthropology of Europe, edited by Ullrich Kockel, Máiréad Nic Craith, and Jonas Frykman. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing: 572–588

Geană, Gheorghiţă. 1999. “Enlarging the Classical Paradigm. Romanian Experience in Doing Anthropology at Home.” Anthropological Journal on European Cultures 8 (1): 61–78.

Ghinoiu, Ion, ed. 2003. Romanian Ethnographic Atlas. Volume 1: Habitatul. Bucharest: Monitorul oficial.

Iorga, Alexandru. 2015. “Etnografie în România. Disciplinarea culturii şi hegemonia umbrelor trecutului.” In Modes of appropriation and social resistance, XIth conferen ce of the Society for Social and Cultural Anthropology (SASC), edited by Gabriel Troc, and Bogdan Iancu. Bucureşti: Tritonic: 11–33.

Iosif, Corina. 2012. “Producing and Consuming “Folklore”: A study of the Origins and Usages of Folklore as a Field of Media Culture in Post-communist Romania.” Transylvanian Review 21, Supplement 4, 2012: 391–404.

Karnoouh, Claude. 2011. Inventarea poporului-naţiune. Cronici din România şi Europa orientală 1973–2007 [Orig. fr.: L’Invention du Peuple. Chroniques de Roumanie. Translated from French by Teodora Dumitru]. Cluj: Idea Design & Print.

Krader, Lawrence. 1959. “Recent Trends in Soviet Anthropology.” Biennial Review of Anthropology 1: 155–184.

Kürti, László. 1996. “Homecoming: Affairs of Anthropologists in and of Eastern Europe.” Anthropology Today 12(3): 11–15.

Mănuilă, Sabin. 1943. Atlas Ethnographique de la Roumanie, 1930. [Ethnographic Atlas of Rumania, 1930.] Bucharest: State Print.

Mihăilescu, Vintilă. 1993. “L’anthropologie et l’ethnologie en Roumanie. Historique et état des lieux.” [Anthropology and Ethnology in Romania. History and Inventory]. Journal des anthropologues 52 (1): 43-46.

Mihăilescu, Vintilă. 2004. “The Legacies of a ’Nation-Building Ethnology’: Romania”. In Educational Histories of European Social Anthropology, edited by Dorle Dracklé, Edgar R. Iain, and Thomas K. Schippers. New York, Oxford: Berghahn Books: 208–219.

Mihăilescu, Vintilă, Ilia Iliev, and Slobodan Naumović, ed. 2008. Studying Peoples in the People’s Democracies: Socialist Era Anthropology in South-East Europe II. Berlin: LIT.

Simionescu, Paul. 1984. Romanian Ethnology; the Contemporary Scene. In Research Report 24: Economy, Society and Culture in Contemporary Romania. Paper No. 33 retrieved Sept. 2013 from: http://scholarworks.umass.edu/anthro_res_rpt24/33.

Stocking, George W. 1982. “Afterword: A View from the Center.” Ethnos 47 (1–2): 172–186.

Stahl, Henri H. 1981. Amintiri și gânduri din vechea școală a monografiilor sociologi ce. [Memories and thoughts from the old school of the sociological monographs.] Bucureşti: Minerva.

Şerban, Stelu and Dorondel, Ştefan. 2014. “Social Anthropology in Romania after 1990: Shifting Frames.” Ethnologia Balkanica 17: 209-240.

Zamfir, Cătălin, and Filipescu, Iancu, eds. 2015. Sociologa românească.: 1900–2010. O istorie socială. Bucharest: Eikon and Cluj-Napoca: Școala Ardeleană.

Zhdanko, Tatiana A. 1964. “Ethnographic study of development and integration of socialist nations in the USSR.” In Reports/ VII International congress of anthropological and ethnological sciences, Aug. 1964, Vol. 4, Section 6. Moscow: Nauka: 63–72.

Zhdanko, Tatiana A. 1959. The Rumanian Folklore Institute. [Brochure]. Bucharest: Foreign Languages Publishing House

Downloads

Published

2020-01-10

Issue

Section

Articles/Články

How to Cite

Ethnography in Romania: Hegemony, Project and the Myth of Structuralism. (2020). Cargo Journal, 18(1-2), 37-49. http://cargojournal.org/index.php/cargo/article/view/46

Similar Articles

1-10 of 36

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.