Cameras, Kinship and Marriage on Groote Eylandt, Australia: Frederick Rose and Peter Worsley’s Challenge to Rivers’ Genealogical Method

Authors

  • Valerie Munt The Flinders University of South Australia Autor

Keywords:

Frederick, G. G. Rose, Peter Worsley, A. R. Radcliffe-Brown, The Genealogical Method, W. H. R. Rivers, Australia’s Groote-Eylandt, Kinship

Abstract

To be an anthropological heretTo be an anthropological heretic is not in itself unusual, but to critique W. H. R. Rivers, the ‘founder of the modern study of social organization’, and his ‘pupil’ A. R. Radcliffe-Brown, who established the science of social anthropology in five continents seems like professional madness, but this is what Frederick Rose did – he attacked the heart of their methodology – the mapping of kinship via the Genealogical Method. This paper explains how Rose’s critique of Rivers’ methodology began during his fieldwork (1938–41) on Groote Eylandt off Australia’s far north coast and how his observations were supported and extended by Peter Worsley’s fieldwork among the Wanindiljaugwa in 1953, indicating an entirely new approach to Australian kinship studies. Although these methodological innovations were praised by some contemporary influential anthropologists and followed up by colleagues in the West during the 1970s and later, Cold War tensions and a closed and politically conservative anthropological establishment combined to marginalize Rose and Worsley’s valuable contribution to the study of Australian kinship. ic is not in itself unusual, but to critique W. H. R. Rivers, the ‘founder of the modern study of social organization’, and his ‘pupil’ A. R. Radcliffe-Brown, who established the science of social anthropology in five continents seems like professional madness, but this is what Frederick Rose did – he attacked the heart of their methodology – the mapping of kinship via the Genealogical Method. This paper explains how Rose’s critique of Rivers’ methodology began during his fieldwork (1938–41) on Groote Eylandt off Australia’s far north coast and how his observations were supported and extended by Peter Worsley’s fieldwork among the Wanindiljaugwa in 1953, indicating an entirely new approach to Australian kinship studies. Although these methodological innovations were praised by some contemporary influential anthropologists and followed up by colleagues in the West during the 1970s and later, Cold War tensions and a closed and politically conservative anthropological establishment combined to marginalize Rose and Worsley’s valuable contribution to the study of Australian kinship.

References

Allman, Jean, and John Parker. 2005. Tongnaab: The History of a West African God. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Australian Archives CRS A659, item 44/1/4313.

Barnes, John. A. 1980. Kinship Studies: Some Impressions of the Current State of Play. Man, 15 (2): 293–303.

Barth, Fredrik. 2005. “The Golden Age, 1945–1970.” In One Discipline, Four Ways: British, German, French and American Anthropology (Halle Lectures), edited by Fredrik Barth, Andre Gingrich, Robert Parkin, and Sydel Silverman. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press: 32–43.

Bernal, John, and Maurice Cornforth. 1949. Science for Peace and Socialism. Watford, Great Britain: Farleigh Press.

Bodley, John. H. 2011. Cultural Anthropology: Tribes, States, and the Global System. Plymouth, United Kingdom: AltaMira Press.

Bodrogi, Tibor. 1961. Review of Classification of Kin. Acta Ethnographica 10 (1–2): 237–239.

Book Of Common Prayer of the Church of England, n. d. [1662 Edition]. London: Oxford University Press.

Bouquet, Mary. 1993. Reclaiming English Kinship: Portuguese Refractions of British Kinship Theory. Manchester & New York: Manchester University Press.

Certeau, Michel de. 1984. On the Practice of Everyday Life. (trans. Steven F. Rendall). Berkeley: University of California Press.

Denham, Woodrow, W. 2012. Kinship, Marriage and Age in Aboriginal Australia. Mathematical Anthropology and Cultural Theory: An International Journal 4 (1), May. 1–79. http://mathematicalanthropology.org/Pdf/MACT_Denham_0512.pdf

———. 2013. Beyond Fictions of Closure. Mathematical Anthropology and Cultural Theory: An International Journal 5,1. 1-90. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339944146_Beyond_fictions_of_closure_in_Australian_Aboriginal_kinship

———. 2016. Group Compositions in Band Societies Database.... At Research Gate: https://www.researchgate.net/project/Group-Compositions-in-Band-Societies-Database At KinSources: kinsources.net. Accessed 3. 11. 2022.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350788238_Artificial_Intelligence_Machine_Learning_Research_Using_the_Australian_Aboriginal_Alyawarra_Kinship_Dataset_Partial_Bibliography_2004-2020. Accessed 3. 11. 2022.

Duby, Georges. 1994. Love and Marriage in the Middle Ages (trans. Jane Dunnett). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Einstein, Albert. 2009 [1949]. Why Socialism? Monthly Review. An Independent Socialist Magazine 61 (1) https://monthlyreview.org/2009/05/01/mr-061-01-2009-05_0/. Accessed 3. 11. 2022.

Edwards, Elizabeth. 1998. “Performing Science: Still Photography and the Torres Strait Expedition.” In Centenary Essays on the 1898 Anthropological Expedition, edited by Anita Herle and Sandra Rouse. Cambridge: Cambridge University: 106–135.

Elkin, Adolphus. P. 1938. The Australian Aborigines: How to Understand Them. Sydney and London: Angus and Robinson.

Emmet, Dorothy, and Alasdair C. Macintyre eds. 1970. Sociological Theory and Philosophical Analysis. New York: Macmillan.

Eriksen, Thomas Hylland, and Finn Sivert Nielsen. 2001. A History of Anthropology. London; Ann Arbor, MI: Pluto Press.

Evans-Pritchard, Edward. E. 1949. The Sanusi of Cyrenaica. London, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———. 1951 Kinship and Marriage among the Nuer. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Favenc, Ernest. 1896. The Secret of the Australian Desert. London: Blackie.

Fortes, Meyer. 1962 [1945]. The dynamics of clanship among the Tallensi: being the first part of an analysis of the social structure of a Trans-Volta tribe. Oosterhout: Anthropological Publications.

Foucault, Michel. 2002 [1966]. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. London and New York: Routledge.

Fox, Robin. 1967. Kinship and Marriage: An Anthropological Perspective. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Frazer, James. 1890. The Golden Bough. London: Macmillan and Co.

Georgeson, H. 1998. “Part One: Foundation of the Chair of Anthropology at the University of Sydney in 1926.” Newsletter, Australian Anthropological Society, University of Sydney. 73, 18–21, 5–8.

Godelier, Maurice. Letter to Frederick Rose. February 2nd 1978. Catalogued Rose Papers. Box 13.

Godelier, Maurice, Thomas R. Trautmann, and Franklin Tjon Sie Fat. 1988. Transformation of Kinship. Washington D.C. Smithsonian Institution Press.

Gray, Geoffrey, G. 2007. A Cautious Silence: The Politics of Anthropology. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press.

———. 2015. ‘A Great Deal of Mischief Can Be Done:’ Peter Worsley, the Australian National University, the Cold War and Academic Freedom, 1952–1954. Journal of the Royal Australian Historical Society 100, Part 1: 25–44.

Grimshaw, Anna. 2001. The Ethnographer’s Eye: Ways of Seeing in Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Guhr, Günter. 1963. Heirat und Verwandtschaftssystem bei den Aranda in Zentralaustralien: Kritik des sogenannten Aranda-Typs von Radcliffe-Brown. Abhandlungen und Berichte des Staatlichen Museums für Völkerkunde, Dresden Bd 23. Verlag Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1963.

———. 1991a. Frederick G.G. Rose (1915 bis 1991) zum Gedenken: Biographisch und Werk. Ethnographisch-Archaologische Zeitschrift 32: 511–519.

———. 1991b. Veröffentlichungen von Frederick, G.G. Rose. Zusammengestellt von Günther Guhr. Ethnographisch-Archäologische Zeitschrift 32: 820–827.

Habermas, Jürgen. 1972. Knowledge and Human Interests (translated by Jeremy Shapiro). Boston USA: Beacon Books.

Hasluck, Paul 1962. Letter to Rose, Frederick. (1/8/62) Rose Papers, uncatalogued. Mitchell Library, State Library of NSW. Box 21.

Hiatt, Lester. R. 1985. Maidens, Males and Marx: Some Contrasts in the Work of Frederick Rose and Claude Meillassoux.” Oceania 56 (1): 34–36.

Hiatt, Lester. R. 2006. Local Organization Among the Australian Aborigines. In Before it’s Too Late: Anthropological Reflections, 1950-1970, edited by Geoffrey Gray. Australia: University of Sydney: 117–137.

Hodson, Thomas Callan. 1937. India. Census Ethnography 1901–1931. In https://archive.org/details/dli.granth.117746. Accessed 3. 11. 2022.

Hymes, Dell, H. 1991. “Afterword”. In Language, Self, and Society: A Social History of Language, edited by Peter Burke and Roy Porter. Cambridge: Polity Press: 330–345.

Insoll, Timothy. 2010. Meyer Fortes and Material Culture: The Published Image and the Unpublished Resource. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 16 (3): 572-587.

Jong de, Josselin to Paul Hasluck.18th June 1962. Box 31 Uncatalogued Rose Papers. SLNSW.

King James Bible, Genesis 1-28. https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Genesis-1-28/. Accessed 3. 11. 2022.

Kociumbas, Jan. 2004. “Genocide and modernity in colonial Australia, 1788–1850”. In Genocide and Settler Society: Frontier Violence and Stolen Indigenous Children in Australian History, edited by A. Dirk Moses. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books. 77–102.

Kuklick, Henrika. 1998. “Fieldworkers and Physiologists in Cambridge and the Torres Strait.” In Centenary Essays on the 1898 Anthropological Expedition, edited by Anita Herle and Sandra Rouse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 158–180.

Langham, Ian. 1981. The Building of British Social Anthropology: W. H. R. Rivers and his Cambridge Disciples in the Development of Kinship Studies, 1898-1931. Dordrecht, Holland / Boston, USA / London, England: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

Larson, Frances. 2011. Did He Ever Darn His Stockings? Beatrice Blackwood and the Ethnographic Authority of Bronislaw Malinowski. History and Anthropology 22 (1): 75–92.

Lawrence, David. 2006. “Government Anthropologist of New Guinea.” Frederick Watson Fellowship Paper, Public Lecture for the National Archives of Australia. Presented 23rd March 2006.

Layard, John, W. 1998. “The Story of My Life (the history of a failure)” – extracts from personal diary. Edited and submitted by Michael Allen to the Newsletter/Australian Anthropological Society, September issue, 73: 9–18.

Leach, Edmund. 1961. Pul Eliya, a Village in Ceylon: A study of Land Tenure and Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

———. 1982. Social Anthropology. Great Britain: Fontana Books.

Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1969 [1949]. The Elementary Structures of Kinship. London: Eyre and Spottiswood.

Lindquist, Sven. 2007. Terra Nullius: A Journey through No One’s Land. London: Granta Publications.

Lyotard, Jean-François.1979. La condition postmoderne: rapport sur le savoir. Paris: Minuit. English trans. Manchester University Press 1984.

McKnight, David. 1994. Australia’s Spies and their Secrets. St. Leonards: NSW, Australia.

McLennan, John. F. 1865. Primitive Marriage, an Inquiry into the Origin of the Form of Capture in Marriage Ceremonies. London: Reprint.

Maddock, Kenneth, J. 1991. Frederick Rose (1915-1991) an Appreciation. Oceania 62 (1), September issue: 66–69.

Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1966 [1922]. Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An Account of Native Enterprise and Adventure in the Archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd; New York: E. P. Dutton and Company Inc.

Monteath, Peter. 2010. “The Anthropologist as Cold War Warrior: The interesting times of Frederick Rose”. In Europe’s Expansions and Contractions, edited by Evan Smith. Adelaide: Humanities Press: 259–280.

Monteath, Peter, and Valerie Munt. 2015. Red Professor: The Cold War Life of Fred Rose. Mile End, Adelaide: Wakefield Press.

———. 1877. Ancient Society or Researches in the Lines of Human Progress from Savagery through Barbarism to Civilization. London: MacMillan.

Mulvaney, Derek, John, and John Henry Calaby. 1985. ‘So Much That is New’ Baldwin Spencer 1860–1929: A Biography. Melbourne, Victoria: Melbourne University Press.

Munt, Valerie. 2011. Australian Anthropology, Ideology and Political Repression: The Cold War Experience of Frederick. G. G. Rose. Anthropological Forum 2 (2), July Issue: 109–129.

Needham, Rodney. 1971. Rethinking Kinship and Marriage. London: Routledge.

Noack, K. and M. Krause. 2005. “Ethnographie as a united anthropological science in the German Democratic Republic.” Hann, C. Sárkány, M. and Skalník P. Studying Peoples in the People’s Democracies: Socialist Era Anthropology in East-Central Europe. Mȕnster: LIT Verlag; New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers: 25–53.

Notes and Queries on Anthropology. 1929. 5th Edition. Edited for the British Association for the Advancement of Science by a Committee of Section H. London: The Royal Anthropological Institute.

Parkin, Robert. 2005. “The French Speaking Countries.” In One Discipline, Four Ways: British, German, French and American Anthropology, edited by Fredrik Barth, Andre Gingrich, Robert Parkin, and Sydel Silverman. London: University of Chicago Press: 157–256.

Peterson, Nicolas. 1976. “The natural and cultural areas of Aboriginal Australia.” In Tribes and Boundaries in Australia, edited by Nicolas Peterson. Canberra: AIAS.

Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred Reginald. 1930. The Social Organization of Australian Tribes. Oceania. 1 (2): 206–246.

———. 1935. Patrilineal and Matrilineal Succession. Iowa Law Review 20 (2): 286–303.

Rademaker, Laura. 2014. Language and Australian Aboriginal History: Anindilyakwa and English on Groote Eylandt. History Australia. Journal of the Australian Historical Association 11 (2), August issue: 222–239.

Rivers, William, Halse, Rivers, Rivers. 1929 [1900]. A Genealogical Method of Collecting Social and Vital Statistics. The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland. 30 Fifth Edition: 74–82. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2842619

Rose, Frederick, G. G. 1960. The Classification of Kin, Age Structure and Marriage amongst the Groote Eylandt Aborigines: A Study in Method and a Theory of Kinship. Berlin: Academie Verlag.

———. 1963. “On the Structure of the Australian Family.” Selected Papers of the Paris International Congress of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences 6 (2): 247–251.

———. [1968] 1987. “Australian Marriage, Land-owning Groups, and Initiations.” In Man the Hunter: the First Intensive Survey of a Single, Crucial Stage of Human Development - Man's Once Universal Hunting Way of Life. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

———. 1978. Die Ethnographie von Groote Eylandt und eine neue Interpretation der sozialen Organization der Australier. Ethnographisch-Archäologische Zeitschrift. 4: 613–626.

———. 1987. The Traditional Mode of Production of the Australian Aborigines, London: Angus and Robertson.

———. Papers, uncatalogued. Mitchell Library, State Library of New South Wales. Including: unpublished Memoir, “An Un-apologetic Anthropologist” – n.d. Rose Papers, box 1. In 2007 these were uncatalogued. In 2010 part of the collection was re-organized by Dominik Lauer and numbered differently. See: “Listing of General Correspondence Series from Frederick Rose Further papers” (May 1994 and June 1995 consignments). This is abbreviated to “Rose Papers” in this article.

———. Draft of thesis not used in published Preface (n.d) Rose papers, Box 19.

———. Letter to Leslie White. 7th February 1950. Rose Papers. Box 34.

———. Letter to Claude Lévi-Strauss. 31st March 1958. Rose Papers. Box 34.

———. 1943. “Fossil Society.” Transcript of Perth radio program. Rose Papers. Box 1.

Ryan, Simon. 1996. The Cartographic Eye: How Explorers Saw Australia. Cambridge: The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.

Sabean, David. W., and Simon Teuscher. 2007. “Kinship in Europe: Approaches to Long-term Development (1300-1900).” In Kinship in Europe: Approaches to Long-term Development (1300-1900), edited by David Warren Sabean, Simon Teuscher, and Jon Mathieu. New York, Oxford: Berghahn Books: 1–32.

Sillitoe, Paul. 2005. The Role of Section H at the British Association for the Advancement of Science in the History of Anthropology. Durham Anthropology Journal 13 (2): 1–17.

Slobodin, Richard. 1978. W. H. R. Rivers. New York: Columbia University Press.

Spencer, Baldwin and Gillen, Frank. J. 1904. Native tribes of Northern Australia. London: Macmillan.

Stocking, George. W.. 1992. The Ethnographer’s Magic and Other Essays in the History of Anthropology. Wisconsin & London: University of Wisconsin Press.

Stocking, George. W. Jr. 1999. After Tylor: British Social Anthropology,1888–1951. London: Athlone.

The Book of Common Prayer of the Church of England, (1571). London: Oxford University Press, Humphrey Milford Amen House, E. C.

Thomas, Martin. E. 2010. Peter Worsley interviewed by Martin Thomas [Sound recording]. Canberra: National Library of Australia. https://nla.gov.au/nla.obj-219761211/listen. Accessed 3. 11. 2022.

———. 2011. The Many Worlds of R. H. Mathews: In Search of an Australian Anthropologist. Australia. NSW: Allen & Unwin.

Tjon Sie Fat, Franklin. E. 1983. Age metrics and twisted cylinders: predictions from a structural model. American Ethnologist10 (3): 585–604.

———. 1990. Representing Kinship: Simple Models of Elementary Structures. [Dissertation]. Leiden: Leiden University.

Tumarkin, Daniil, Davydovich. 2015. Frederik Rouz (1915–1991) zhizn´i trudy na fone epokhi [Frederick Rose 1915–1991). Life and works on the background of the epoch]. Vestnik antropologii 32 (4): 179–200.

Turner, David. H. 1980. Leiden anthropology and the reinterpretation of Australian Aboriginal Social Organization. Bijdragen tot de taal-, land- en Volkenkunde 136 (1): 116–135.

———. 1996. Return to Eden: A journey through the promised landscape of the Amagalyuagba. New York: Peter Lang.

———. 2021. Life to the Power of Nothing. Oakville, Ontario: Rock Mills Press.

Urry, James. 1972. Notes and Queries on Anthropology and the Development of Field Methods in British Anthropology 1870-1920. Hocart Prize Essay. Proceedings of the Royal Anthropological Institute for 1972: 45–57.

Warner, Marina. 1979. Queen Victoria’s Sketchbook. London: Macmillan.

Wax, Dustin, ed. 2008. Anthropology at the Dawn of the Cold War: The Influence of Foundations, McCarthyism, and the CIA. New York & London, Ann Arbor, MI: Pluto Press.

Wilcken, Patrick. 2010. Claude Lévi-Strauss: The Poet in the Laboratory. New York, USA: The Penguin Group.

Wilder, William, D. 1973. The Culture of Kinship Studies by Rodney Needham [Review]. Bijdragen tot de taal-, land- en Volkenkunde 129 (1): 124–143.

Wise, Tigger. 1985. The Self-made Anthropologist: A Life of A. P. Elkin. Sydney, London and Boston: George Allen & Unwin.

Worsley, Peter. 1954. The Changing Social Structure of the Wanindiljaugwa. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Canberra: Australian National University.

———. 1984. The Three Worlds: Culture and World Development. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

———. 1991. Iconoclast of the Outback: Obituary for Professor Rose. The Guardian 18th February: 35.

———. 1992. “The Practice of Politics and the Study of Australian Kinship.” In Dialectical Anthropology: Essays in Honor of Stanley Diamond, Vol 2, The Politics of Culture and Creativity, edited by Christine Ward Gailey. Gainesville, USA: University of Florida.

———. 2008. Skating on Thin Ice. NewYork, Oxford: Berghahn Books.

PERSONAL CORRESPONDENCE

Denham, Woodrow. Email correspondence to Valerie Munt (30th June 2012); (14th August 2012); (September 14th, 2021).

Turner, David. Email correspondence to Valerie Munt (February 27th, 2013); (April 16th, 2014); (January 3rd, 2021).

Tjon Sie Fat, Franklin. Email Correspondence to Valerie Munt (October 31st, 2017).

Worsley, Peter. Email correspondence to Valerie Munt (August 20th, 2011) & (August 23rd, 2011).

Worsely, Peter. Email correspondence to Peter Monteath and Valerie Munt (August 20th, 2011).

Worsley, Peter. Personal interview with Valerie Munt, London, April 17th: 2012.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-01

Issue

Section

Articles/Články

How to Cite

Cameras, Kinship and Marriage on Groote Eylandt, Australia: Frederick Rose and Peter Worsley’s Challenge to Rivers’ Genealogical Method. (2022). Cargo Journal, 20(1-2), 7-35. http://cargojournal.org/index.php/cargo/article/view/22