“The Aim is always Joy!”  The Hybrid Gift as an Anchor for Morality

Authors

  • Barbora Stehlíková Charles University Autor

Keywords:

gift, exchange, morality, assemblage, generosity

Abstract

This article aims to analyze a specific form of the gift and its role in human lives, and to explore the moral and ethical values in which the gift is entangled. In 2012, Czech millionaire and Buddhist Libor Malý founded the “generous social network” Hearth.net as the basis of a new social and economic system. Hearth is a space where users offer and receive gifts without any expectation of a counter-gift. The network raises a debate concerning the nature of the gift and promotes heterogeneous approaches to the gift. Based on long-term ethnographic research on Hearth.net investigating gift giving, receiving, soliciting, and reciprocity, I argue that the gift reflects insecurities in human lives and relations. I perceive the gift as a hybrid that comprises the ideology of the pure gift, positive moral values, desire for an alternative system, pragmatic choices of everyday life, and tools of the market economy. Thanks to this multiplicity, the gift provides an ambiguous yet safe category through which individual development and improvement of society can be carried out. It represents an anchor for morality in the contemporary elusive world.

References

Appadurai, Arjun. 1986. “Introduction: Commodities and the Politics of Value.” In The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, edited by Arjun Appadurai. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 3–63.

Arvidsson, Adam, and Nicolai Peitersen. 2013. The Ethical Economy: Rebuilding Value After the Crisis. New York: Columbia University Press.

Carrier, James G. 1990. Gifts in a World of Commodities: The Ideology of the Perfect Gift in American Society. Social Analysis: The International Journal of Social and Cultural Practice 29: 19–37.

. 1992. The Gift in Theory and Practice in Melanesia: A Note on the Centralit y of Gift Exchange. Ethnology, 31: 185–93.

. 2005. Gifts and Commodities: Exchange and Western Capitalism Since 1700. London, New York: Routledge.

Fox, Nick J, and Pam Alldred. 2015. New Materialist Social Inquiry: Designs, Methods and the Research­Assemblage. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 18, 4: 399–414.

Graeber, David. 2001. Toward an Anthropological Theory of Value: The False Coin of Our Own Dreams. New York: Palgrave.

Gregory, Chris A. 1982. Gifts and Commodities. London: Academic Press.

Gudeman, Stephen F. 2001. “Postmodern Gifts.” In Post-Modernism, Economics and Knowledge, edited by Stephen Cullenberg, Jack Amariglio, and David Ruccio. London: Routledge.

Hearn, Alison. 2010. Structuring Feeling: Web 2.0, Online Ranking and Rating, and the Digital ‘Reputation’ Economy. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization 10: 421–38.

Heim, Maria. 2004. Theories of the Gift in South Asia: Hindu, Buddhist, and Jain Reflections on Dana. New York: Routledge.

Henig, David. 2018. Economic Theologies of Abundance: Halal Exchange and the Limits of Neoliberal Effects in Post­war Bosnia–Herzegovina. Ethnos 84: 223–240.

Kan, Sergei. 1986. The 19th­Century Tlingit Potlatch: A New Perspective. American Ethnologist 13: 191–212.

Laidlaw, James. 2000. A Free Gift Makes no Friends. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 6: 617–634.

Mauss, Marcel. 2016. The Gift. Expanded Edition. Chicago: Hau Books.

Miller, Daniel. 2001. “Alienable Gifts and Inalienable Commodities.” In The Empire of Things: Regimes of Value and Material Culture, edited by Fred Myers. Santa Fe, New Mexico: School of American Research Press: 91–118.

Parry, Jonathan. 1986. The gift, the Indian gift and the ‘Indian gift’. Man 21, 3: 453–473.

Raheja, Gloria Goodwin. 1988. The Poison in the Gift: Ritual, Prestation, and the Dominant Caste in a North Indian Village. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

Retsikas, Kostas. 2016. The Other Side of the Gift: Soliciting in Java. Heidelberg Ethnology, Occasional Paper: 1–16.

Simpson, Bob. 2004. Impossible Gifts: Bodies, Buddhism and Bioethics in Contemporary Sri Lanka. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 10, 4: 839–859.

Svoboda, František. 2010. Ekonomika daru, dar a jeho reflexe v ekonomické teorii. Politická ekonomie 58, 1: 103–127.

Tsing, Anna. 2013. Sorting Out Commodities: How Capitalist Value is Made Through Gifts. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3, 1: 21–43.

Widlok, Thomas. 2016. Anthropology and the Economy of Sharing. London, New York: Routledge.

Zigon, Jarrett. 2010. Moral and Ethical Assemblages. Anthropological Theory 10, 1–2: 3–15.

. 2014. Attunement and Fidelity: Two Ontological Conditions for Morally Being­in­the­World. Ethos 42, 1: 16–30.

Downloads

Published

2021-01-10

Issue

Section

Articles/Články

How to Cite

“The Aim is always Joy!”  The Hybrid Gift as an Anchor for Morality. (2021). Cargo Journal, 19(1-2), 86-104. http://cargojournal.org/index.php/cargo/article/view/39