Thinking with “Postsocialism” in an Ethnographic Study of Old Age in Poland
Keywords:
postsocialism, theory, ethnography, Poland, agingAbstract
Twenty-five years after the end of state socialism in Central and Eastern Europe, how useful is the category of postsocialism? In this article, I suggest one possible answer to this question through a discussion of how this category emerged during ethnographic fieldwork on aging, personhood, and memory in Wrocław and Poznań, Poland. A binary Cold War framework that opposes socialism to postsocialism and East to West does not sufficiently explain the complexities of processes by which persons and social relations are created and transformed. However, “postsocialism” is defensible as an ethnographic, rather than analytic, category because these binary categories shape people’s expectations, hopes and imaginations. Ethnographic fieldwork in a range of institutional and non-institutional contexts found that older people were often understood as relics of the socialist past, that some older people look to the “West” for moral exemplars, and that national narratives of suffering provide moral frameworks for older Poles’ life histories. By interpreting these findings through a theoretical framework that centers on the processual formation of personhood and relatedness, this article thus helps anthropologists of Central and Eastern Europe create research imaginaries that escape dominant binary frameworks.
References
Beidelman, Thomas O. [1986]1993. Moral Imagination in Kaguru Modes of Thought. Washington Smithsonian Institution Press.
Borneman, John. 1992. Belonging in the Two Berlins: Kin, State, Nation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brubaker, Rogers, and Frederick Cooper. 2000. “Beyond ‘Identity’.” Theory and Society 29: 1-47.
Buch, Elana D. 2013. “Senses of Care: Embodying Inequality and Sustaining Personhood in the Home Care of Older Adults in Chicago.” American Ethnologist 40(4): 637-650.
Buchowski, Michał. 2004. “Hierarchies of Knowledge in Central Eastern European Anthropology.” Anthropology of East Europe Review 22(2):5-14.
Buchowski, Michał. 2005. “Correspondence: Reply to Chris Hann.” Anthropology of East Europe Review 23(1): 198-200.
Buchowski, Michał. 2012. “Intricate Relations between Western Anthropologists and Eastern Ethnologists.” Focaal 63: 20-38.
Caldwell, Melissa L. 2004. Not by Bread Alone: Social Support in the New Russia. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Caldwell, Melissa L. 2007. “Elder Care in the New Russia: The Changing Face of Compassionate Social Security.” Focaal (50): 66-80.
Carlbäck, Helene, Yulia Gradskova, and Zhanna Kravchenko, eds. 2012. And They Lived Happily Ever Aft er: Norms and Everyday Practices of Family and Parenthood in Russia and Central Europe. Budapest: Central European University Press.
Carsten, Janet. 2000. “Introduction: Cultures of Relatedness.” In Cultures of Relatedness: New Approaches to the Study of Kinship, edited by Janet Carsten, 1-36. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Carsten, Janet. 2007. “Introduction: Ghosts of Memory.” In Ghosts of Memory: Essays on Remembrance and Relatedness, edited by Janet Carsten, 1-35. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Červinková, Hana. 2012. “Postcolonialism, Postsocialism and the Anthropology of EastCentral Europe.” Journal of Postcolonial Writing 48(2): 155-163.
Chelcea, Liviu. 2003. “Ancestors, Domestic Groups, and the Socialist State: Housing Nationalization and Restitution in Romania.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 45: 714-740.
Cohen, Lawrence. 1998. No Aging in India: Alzheimer’s, the Bad Family, and Other Modern Things. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Daniel, E. Valentine. 1984. Fluid Signs: Being a Person the Tamil Way. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Dumont, Louis. 1980. Homo Hierarchicus: The Caste System and Its Implications. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dunn, Elizabeth. 2004. Privatizing Poland: Baby Food, Big Business, and the Remaking of Labor. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Dunn, Elizabeth Cullen, and Katherine Verdery. 2011. “Dead Ends in the Critique of (Post) Socialist Anthropology: Reply to Thelen.” Critique of Anthropology 31(3): 251-255.
Foster, Liam, and Alan Walker. 2014. “Active and Successful Aging: A European Policy Perspective.” The Gerontologist. http://gerontologist.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/ 2014 /06/09/geront.gnu028.abstract
Hann, Chris. 2005. “Correspondence: Reply to Michał Buchowski.” Anthropology of East Europe Review 23(1): 194-197.
Haukanes, Haldis, and Frances Pine, eds. 2005. Generations, Kinship and Care: Gendered Provisions of Social Security in Central Eastern Europe. Bergen, Norway: University of Bergen.
Heider, Karl G. 1988. “The Rashomon Eff ect: When Ethnographers Disagree.” American Anthropologist 90(1): 73-81.
Kharkhordin, Oleg. 1999. The Collective and the Individual in Russia: A Study of Practices. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Krzyżowski, Łukasz, Wojciech Kowalik, Katarzyna Suwada, and Anna Pawlina. 2014. Młodzi emeryci w Polsce: Między biernościa a aktywnościa [Young Retirees in Poland: Between Passivity and Activity]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe SCHOLAR.
Lamb, Sarah. 2000. White Saris and Sweet Mangos: Aging, Gender, and Body in North India. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lampland, Martha. 1995. The Object of Labor: Commodifi cation in Socialist Hungary. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Marriott, McKim. 1976. “Hindu Transactions: Diversity without Dualism.” In Transaction and Meaning: Directions in the Anthropology of Exchange and Symbolic Behavior, edited by Bruce Kapferer. Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.
Mauss, Marcel. 1985[1938]. “A Category of the Human Mind: The Notion of Person, the Notion of Self.” In The Category of the Person: Anthropology, Philosophy, History, edited by Michael Carrithers, Steven Collins, and Steven Lukes, 1-25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mauss, Marcel. 1990[1925]. The Gift : The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies, translated by W. D. Halls. New York: W. W. Norton.
McKinnon, Susan, and Fenella Cannell, eds. 2013. Vital Relations: Modernity and the Persistent Life of Kinship. Santa Fe: School for Advanced Research Press.
Petryna, Adriana. 2002. Life Exposed: Biological Citizens aft er Chernobyl. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Phillips, Sarah D. 2011. Disability and Mobile Citizenship in Postsocialist Ukraine. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Pine, Frances. 1996. “Naming the House and Naming the Land: Kinship and Social Groups in Highland Poland.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2(3): 443-459.
Read, Rosie, and Tatjana Thelen. 2007. “Introduction: Social Security and Care aft er Socialism: Reconfi gurations of Public and Private.” Focaal 50: 3-18.
Rivkin-Fish, Michele. 2005. Women’s Health in Post-Soviet Russia: The Politics of Intervention. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Rivkin-Fish, Michele. 2011. “Health, Gender, and Care Work: Productive Sites for Thinking Anthropologically About the Aft ermaths of Socialism.” Anthropology of East Europe Review 29(1): 8-15.
Robbins, Jessica C. 2013a. “Shift ing Moral Ideals of Aging in Poland: Suff ering, Self-Actualization, and the Nation.” In Transitions and Transformations: Cultural Perspectives on the Life Course, edited by Caitrin Lynch and Jason Danely, 79-91. New York: Berghahn Books.
Robbins, Jessica C. 2013b. “Understanding Aktywność in Ethnographic Contexts: Aging, Memory, and Personhood in Poland.” Forum Oświatowe (Educational Forum) 1(48): 87-101.
Robbins-Ruszkowski, Jessica C. “ ‘Active Aging’ as Citizenship in Poland.” In Generations: Rethinking Age and Citizenship, edited by Richard Marback. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, forthcoming.
Robbins-Ruszkowski, Jessica C. 2013. “Challenging Marginalization at the Universities of the Third Age in Poland.” Anthropology & Aging Quarterly 34(2): 157-169.
Stanisz, Agata. 2014. Rodzina Made in Poland: Antropologia pokrewieństwa i życia rodzinnego. Poznań: Agata Stanisz.
Stillo, Jonathan. 2012. “Who Cares for the Caregivers: Romanian Women’s Experiences with Tuberculosis.” Anthropology Now 4(1): 10-17.
Strathern, Marilyn. 1988. The Gender of the Gift : Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Thelen, Tatjana. 2011. “Shortage, Fuzzy Property and Other Dead Ends in the Anthropological Analysis of (Post)Socialism.” Critique of Anthropology 31(1): 43-61.
Thelen, Tatjana. 2012. “Economic Concepts, Common Grounds and ‘New’ Diversity in the Anthropology of Post-Socialism: Reply to Dunn and Verdery.” Critique of Anthropology 32(1): 87-90.
Zalewska, Joanna. 2009. Stary człowiek w kulturze młodości. Doświadczanie starości wśród warszawskich seniorów. Polska Akademia Nauk.
Zalewska, Joanna. 2010. “Starość a przemiany więzi społecznych [Old Age and Changes in Social Relationships].” Kultura i Społeczeństwo 54(3): 131-150.