Twilight Zone Anthropologies: The Case of Central Europe
Keywords:
hierarchies of knowledge, world anthropologies, twilight zone anthropologies, Central and Eastern European anthropologiesAbstract
This article aims at contributing to the discussion on the global hierarchies of knowledge and flows of anthropological ideas. Anthropologists perceive themselves as advocates of an egalitarian ethos. Nevertheless, for various interrelated reasons, the discipline of anthropology is divided into privileged and underprivileged regions. Cross-cutting disparities find expression in such notions as center and periphery, Global South and North and, last but not least, East and West. Central and Eastern European anthropology, which was already diversified under communist regimes, has become even more varied in the postsocialist period. Despite this it is often perceived by metropolitan anthropologies as a provincial enterprise burdened by paradigms from the past. These intricate power relations are described and the pecking order of different systems of knowledge questioned. By referring to selected achievements of anthropologists in Central Europe, the intellectual and innovative potential of twilight zone anthropologies is promoted.
References
Barański, Janusz. 2008. “New Polish Ethnology.” Studia ethnologica Croatica 20: 211-222.
Benedyktowicz, Zbigniew, Czesław Robotycki, Ludwik Stomma, Ryszard Tomicki, and Jerzy Wasilewski. 1980, 1980a, 1981. “Antropologia kultury w Polsce – dziedzictwo, pojęcia, inspiracje. Materiały do słownika.” Polska Sztuka Ludowa: part 1 – 34(1), 1980: 47-60; part 2 – 34(2), 1980a: 117-125; part III – 35(1), 1981: 58-60.
Buchowski, Michał. 2002. “Main Currents in Polish Anthropology: Continuity in Change Before and Aft er 1989.” In Die Wende als Wende? Orientierungen Europäischer Ethnologien nach 1989, edited by Konrad Köstlin, Peter Niedermüller, and Hans Nikitsch, 63-82. Wien: Institut für Europaische Ethnologie.
Buchowski, Michał. 2011. “Polish Ethnology in the Periods of ‘Early’ and ‘Late’ Socialism: from NonMarxist Orthodoxy to Post-Ethnographical Pluralism.” In Sociology and Ethnography in East-Central Europe and South-East Europe: Scientifi c Self-Description in State Socialist Countries, edited by Ulf Brunnbauer, Claudia Kraft, and Martin Schulze, 147-172. Münich: OldenbourgVerlag.
Buchowski, Michał. 2012. Etnologia polska: historie i powinowactwa. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Nauka i Innowacje.
Červinková, Hana. 2009. “Postcolonialism, Postsocialism and the Anthropology of EastCentral Europe.” Journal of Postcolonial Writing 48 (2): 155-163.
Elchinova, Magdalena. 2002. “In Statu Nascendi: Anthropology in Bulgaria.” In The Struggles for Sociocultural Anthropology in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by Peter Skalník, 23-41. Prague: Set Out.
Fabian, Johannes. 1983. Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes its Objects. New York: Columbia University Press.
Gellner, Ernest. 1992. Reason and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.
Godina, Vesna. 2002. “From Ethnology to Anthropology and Back Again: Negotiating the Boundaries of Ethnology and Anthropology in Post-socialist European Countries.” In The Struggles for Sociocultural Anthropology in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by Peter Skalník, 1-22. Prague: Set Out.
Grosfougel, Ramon. 2008. “Transmodernity, Border Thinking, and Global Coloniality: Decolonizing Political Economy and Postcolonial Studies.” Eurozine. http://www.eurozine. com/articles/2008-07-04-grosfoguel-en.html.
Gupta, Akhil, and James Ferguson. 1997. Culture, Power, Place: Explorations in Critical Anthropology. Chapel Hill: Duke University Press.
Herzfeld, Michael. 2002. “The Absent Presence: Discourses of Crypto-Colonialism.” The South Atlantic Quarterly 101(4): 899-926.
Jasiewicz, Zbigniew, and David Slattery. 1995. “Ethnography and Anthropology: The Case of Polish Ethnology.” In Fieldwork and Footnotes: Studies in the History of European Anthropology, edited by Han F. Vermeulen and Arturo A. Roldan, 184-201. London: Routledge.
Kiliánova, Gabriela. 2005. “Continuity and Discontinuity in an Intellectual Tradition Under Socialism: The ‘Folkloristic School’ in Bratislava.” In Studying Peoples in the People’s Democracies: Socialist Ear Anthropology in East-Central Europe, edited by Chris Hann, Mihály Sárkány, and Peter Skalník, 257-271. Münster: LIT Verlag.
Kundera, Milan. 1984. “The tragedy of Central Europe.” New York Review of Books, April 26.
Lins Ribeiro, Gustavo, and Arturo Escobar, eds. 2006. World Anthropologies: Disciplinary Transformations in Systems of Power. New York: Berg.
Lins Ribeiro, Gustavo, and Arturo Escobar, 2006. “World Anthropologies: Disciplinary Transformations within Systems of Power.” In World Anthropologies: Disciplinary Transformations in Systems of Power, edited by Gustavo Lins Ribeiro, and Arturo Escobar, 1-25. New York: Berg.
Ortner, Sherry. 1984. “Theory in Anthropology in the Sixties.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 26: 126-166.
Koff er, Blanka. 2011. “Ethnography in the ČS(S)R: Scientifi cation through Sovietization?” In Sociology and Ethnogrpahy in East-Central Europe and South-East Europe: Scientifi c Self-Description in State Socialist Countries, edited by Ulf Brunnbauer, Claudia Kraft , and Martin Schulze Wessel, 173-184. Münich: Oldebourg Verlag.
Pałubicka, Anna. 1990. Kulturowy wymiar ludzkiego świata obiektywnego. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza.
Stocking, George W., Jr. 1982. “Aft erword: A View from the Center.” Ethnos 47: 172–186.
Stomma, Ludwik. 1976. “Rytuał pokładzin w Polsce – analiza strukturalna.” Etnografi a Polska 19 (1): 51-64.
Stomma, Ludwik. 1976a. “Mit Alkmeny.” Etnografi a Polska 20 (1): 99-110.
Verdey, Katherine. 2002. “Wither Postsocialism” [part of: Chris Hann, Caroline Humphrey and Katherine Verdery, Introduction: Postsocialism as a Topic of Anthropological Investigation, 1-28]. In Postsocialism: Ideas, Ideologies and Practicies in Eurasia, edited by Chris Hann, 15-21. London: Routledge.
